William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > I know a few folks were expecting this note last Friday... > here's the scoop. > > Jeff's patch to 2.0 was lovely. What's not lovely is that the > chunked request processing has been hosed since at least 2.0.54. > As much as I'd rather just commit his patch and release, there > is a deeper problem going on that I'm investigating. > > Some of it seems to have to do with trailers and expected <CRLF> > values. I'm not certain the 2.0 filters are doing the right thing. > It seems that the 2.1 filters are correct. > > Until I can get 2.0 to serve all my test cases, it's somewhat > pointless to push out a release. > > On the 1.3 side, I only see one remaining issue <undisclosed> > which I'll commit on Monday and push that out the door. I've > asked for votes on a few patches which are falling on deaf ears. > If you are a 1.3 user, please review. >
You know, we should be creating a branch of the 1.3/2.0/2.1 tree and fold the patches directly into them. Much easier for people to then try them out, update as needed, etc... Now that we have SVN, we should start using it, meaning that in special cases like this, passing patches back and forth is kind of inefficient. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Sith happens" - Yoda
