Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:46:30PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote: > >>Bill Stoddard wrote: >> >>>Jim Jagielski wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I have a bug I'd like to squash in mod_auth_ldap.c in 2.0 that doesn't >>>>exist in 2.1/2.2 (non-existent authn_ldap_request_t req struct during >>>>auth check)... since the module is experimental, can I assume CTR ? >>> >>>+1 >>> >>>IMO, imposing RTC on experimental modules is counter productive. >> >>-1 (vote, not veto). > > > Likewise -1.
Also -1 from my side. > > >>It should be reviewed, regardless of being on applicable to 2.0. Put it >>in the status file, just like everything else. I feel that being in >>'experimental' is not a good excuse for not requiring the same level of >>review as any other change. > > > Plus, the "experimental"-ness of any 2.0 modules is largely meaningless > to users, they just --enable-auth-ldap and don't care about the module > directory structure. +1 Regards Rüdiger
