What other branches are CTR? 1.3? 2.0?
Dependency on any outside library, APR included, is going to
cause dependency on that library's release cycle. Stagnation
happened after 2.0 was released, however.
On another note, if APR is the problem, then why are we even
talking about branching 2.2 before APR is fixed?
-aaron
On Aug 8, 2005, at 11:31 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Aug 8, 2005, at 10:55 PM, Aaron Bannert wrote:
I can't believe you guys are still debating the merits of RTC over
CTR
after all this time. RTC killed the momentum in this project a
long time
ago.
That doesn't make sense, Aaron. The other branches are CTR and
I don't see anyone making releases of those either. We were
operating in RTC mode for the first year of Apache and that was
our most productive time in terms of number of releases.
Personally, I think what is killing momentum is the number of
single-developer platforms we claim to support that end up dragging
the release cycle beyond the capacity of any single RM. That's why
I haven't driven a release since 1.3. APR just makes it worse.
Please, if you want to help, don't bicker about RTC -- just
create a working APR release so that we can do an httpd release.
....Roy
