Mladen Turk wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> Jim Jagielski wrote: > >> > > > > I don't know what you mean... > > Well, IMO if there is a need for a new balancer > one should write a new balancer module. >
Not balancer. Method. > Right now we have both API and functionality > inside mod_proxy that enables one to do that. > > If we start adding hooks to the balancer 'sub module' > we'll end up with the module for the sub module :) > > Anyhow, if someone wishes to write a specific > load balancer module there is API for that, so > I don't see why would we need another one. > Did you even look at the patch? Your comments show a supreme lack of understanding what it does. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Sith happens" - Yoda
