William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > At 12:43 AM 8/18/2005, Paul Querna wrote: > >>Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from >>trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week. I intend to >>include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release. > > > Note you can't tag the recent commit to mod_dir, there > is a veto on the floor.
Yes, I disagree to the said veto, and I hope to have an alternative available before I do this. (If not, I agree completely and will omit that change from the branch, or revert trunk.) >>As long as 2.1.7 seems good, I would like to do a vote on making it a Beta. > > > Our procedure (I forget you are relatively speaking a bit > new to this role :-) is to let this ride three days on > our own infrastructure, eating our own dogfood, so to speak. Sure, if someone in Infrastructure is willing and has the time to set it up. I don't have the karma to do it myself. > If that doesn't keel over I'll support the vote to go beta. > This is not quite GA, IMHO, but getting quite close. > > FYI you can't trash branches willy nilly, which is why I had > warned you not to branch. You must now backport each change > you wish to introduce to 2.2 from trunk/. Not R-T-C, of > course, but C-T-R. Sorry, you dug the hole, now climb out. > Actually, after consulting Karl Fogel(svn-developer) on IRC, he says that re-creating the branch will not cause a problem with people's working copies, as long as both branches have the same origin, which they will. -Paul
