William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> At 12:43 AM 8/18/2005, Paul Querna wrote:
> 
>>Just a heads up, I am planning to RM and tag 2.1.7 (and re-branch from
>>trunk the 2.2.x branch) on Friday or Saturday this week.  I intend to
>>include APR and APR-Util 1.2.1 with this release.
> 
> 
> Note you can't tag the recent commit to mod_dir, there
> is a veto on the floor.

Yes, I disagree to the said veto, and I hope to have an alternative
available before I do this. (If not, I agree completely and will omit
that change from the branch, or revert trunk.)


>>As long as 2.1.7 seems good, I would like to do a vote on making it a Beta.
> 
> 
> Our procedure (I forget you are relatively speaking a bit
> new to this role :-) is to let this ride three days on
> our own infrastructure, eating our own dogfood, so to speak.


Sure, if someone in Infrastructure is willing and has the time to set it
up.  I don't have the karma to do it myself.

> If that doesn't keel over I'll support the vote to go beta.
> This is not quite GA, IMHO, but getting quite close.
> 
> FYI you can't trash branches willy nilly, which is why I had
> warned you not to branch.  You must now backport each change
> you wish to introduce to 2.2 from trunk/.  Not R-T-C, of
> course, but C-T-R.  Sorry, you dug the hole, now climb out.
> 

Actually, after consulting Karl Fogel(svn-developer) on IRC, he says
that re-creating the branch will not cause a problem with people's
working copies, as long as both branches have the same origin, which
they will.

-Paul

Reply via email to