Joe Orton wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 10:17:45AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > Well, what do you know. The balancer had never had any test cases > > at ALL in httpd-test... > > Ahhhh you've blown my sarcasm inhibitor now cap'n, I can't help it... > > Gee, really? Would that be why nobody seems sure whether it actually > works or not? Let's not add any then, this is clearly a good state to > be in. >
*giggle* No, actually you are right. We are claiming that that balancer capability is a big cool feature of 2.1/2.2, yet we have no tests against it, other than what the few of us who use and develop it do by hand. This is a huge hole. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "Sith happens" - Yoda
