On 8/24/05, Colm MacCarthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 09:18:54AM -0500, Parin Shah wrote: > > > > I have fixed that memory leak problem. also added script to include > > > > libcurl whenever this module is included. > > > > > > I hope that it doesn't mean that libcurl is going to be a permanent > > > solution, when subrequests (with minor changes) could serve the same > > > purpose. > > > > Certainly not, We would have mod-c-requester which uses sub-requests > > and not libcurl eventually. but my initial reaction after going > > through the subrequest code was that it may require significant > > refactoring. > > Will it work if you mark the subrequests as proxy requests? IE, the same > approach as mod_rewrite and the P flag. > We had considered proxy requests before. But many of us felt its not good idea to use proxy requests for re-requests. main reason was that proxy-requests creates new connection to the main server.
I have not checked mod_rewrite code yet. so I would go through it and if it seems to solve our problem then it would be great. Thanks for your input. > It introduces a dependency on mod_proxy, but curl introduces a > dependency on libcurl, so that's not so bad. You are right. I believe, that shouldnt be a problem.
