On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 04:18:34PM -0400, Bill Stoddard wrote: > I guess for some definition of "much" I am not suprised. I would expect the > event MPM to consume more CPU than worker under 'low' workloads (low number > of concurrent clients) because it's making more system calls to do the same > amount of work. Event should start to show benefits as the number of > concurrent connections into the server goes up. That's what I would expect > anyway; no idea if the event MPM is sufficiently refined to show any > benefit at any workload.
I definitely see speed improvements using the event MPM, probably due to the lack of an Accept Mutex. I have to get around to hacking the worker MPM to see if that's what it is. -- Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
