William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > What is the real issue with having an experimental module subdir? > > If it makes it easier for people to use it or try it out, then > > why not? > > Because --with-foo / --without-foo syntax gives **NO** indication to > the user, or indication from the user, that they are willing to use > experimental code. >
Certainly configure can be adjusted to print that fact... > It also adds additional headaches. mod_dumpio, for example, clearly > is a logger. Why, as a new module, would one look for it to be within > 'experimental' as opposed to it's purpose (logging). > IMO, the easier we make it for end-users and developers to try out modules that haven't enjoyed a large amount of "real world usage" time, the better. How about instead of 'experimental' something like 'in-development' or 'nrfpty (not ready for prime time yet) :) -- ======================================================================= Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
