On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 04:39:19PM +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Joe Orton said:
> 
> > I think it would actually be sensible at this point to require
> > apr/apr-util >= 1.2.0 across the board.
> 
> +1.

+1 

I might be adding >= 1.3.0 dependencies to trunk soon too, in the form
of configurable buffer sizes for various things. Though not planning to
backport to 2.2., but it makes it less of a jump.

-- 
Colm MacCárthaigh                        Public Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to