William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The 2.1.8 tarball bundles a copy APR 1.2.1 and APR-Util 1.2.1.
I'm afraid -1 on beta (+1 to alpha), until I can roll a binary with apr
and apr-util 1.2.2 (the first to run again on Windows).
I thought apr was semi-decoupled, meaning we would include a minimum
recommended apr, but that it would be compiled against a later, system
installed flavor of apr/apr-util if found? In that case it shouldn't
be an issue to take a subversion bump up on apr.
Actually it occurs to me, if there are no changes to branches/2.1.8/*
(there shouldn't be) and the RM concurs, rerolling with 1.2.2 apr[-util]
or reinserting the 'missing .xml's' should be no problem, if the tarball
never moved to /dist/httpd/.
That's your call as the RM, though.
Bill
