On 10/04/2005 10:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
> 

[..cut..]

> 
> I thought the containers were integral types, not void*. If the containers
> themselves are void*, then the problem is reversed from what I thought,
> but still a valid problem. 

I think we have both problems in the code as we cast void* to integral types
and vice versa.

Regards

Rüdiger

Reply via email to