On 10/04/2005 10:06 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: >
[..cut..] > > I thought the containers were integral types, not void*. If the containers > themselves are void*, then the problem is reversed from what I thought, > but still a valid problem. I think we have both problems in the code as we cast void* to integral types and vice versa. Regards Rüdiger