On 10/11/2005 02:35 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On Oct 10, 2005, at 5:13 PM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/10/2005 05:43 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >>> For consideration:
[..cut..] > > > Yes, I was also considering that case as well; I simply wanted to > give people a head's up on the direction the solution was taking > in order to get prelim feedback. > > Sorry, too impatient again :-(. Nevertheless apart from the xml stuff, any comments about the latest version of the patch I attached yesterday? Regards Rüdiger
