Re: [RFC] require apr/apr-util 1.2.x for 2.2.x

[William A. Rowe, Jr.]

Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:41:18PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:

If I might also ask, would anyone mind if;

        ./configure --with-apr=bundled --with-apr-util=bundled

were added as options? Right now APR_FIND_APU and APR_FIND_APR are given
"1" as the third argument, which means that if apr/apr-util are in the
install prefix - they are preferred over the bundled versions.

That's fine behaviour, but it's also a real hassle for development :-)

+1 but Justin is right, the syntax becomes --with-apr-bundled (or
with-bundled-apr).  The =bundled path syntax is simply wrong.