On 11/01/2005 02:05 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I wanted to avoid making string copies when possible. Plus, we
Ok. That was one point of my question as I saw the need to copy the string as a drawback compared to your approach. I was only unsure how much this counts. > don't want to lowercase the URL, since that means /Foo/bar > would be the same as /FOO/Bar, which is wrong :) Sure, but I actually do not do this. I only lowercase scheme and hostname, because I temporarily terminate my copied string with \0 before I lower case it. So from the functional point of view my approach should do the same as yours. The question was more about which solution - is faster - is more easy to understand if both versions are equally fast Regards Rüdiger [..cut..]
