On 11/20/05, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 11/20/2005 11:00 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > > [..cut..] > > > > > If there is consensus that such trivial CHANGES should not be added (which > > I would > > also tend to with the reasons you mentioned), then I will happily remove > > the CHANGE > > log entry. So another comment please! > > Ok, forget about the removal part. Paul backported it to 2.2.x and taged > 2.1.10 afterwards. > So I cannot remove it for this case. Anyway since I was uncertain about the > 'right' thing > to do here and since it seemed to be handled differently by different people > I still like > to have further comments on this issue :-).
I think it is a good idea for people who show up with patches out of the blue to see a recognition of their contribution, even if relatively small. Many people off the dev list don't realize that a lot of fixes come from random people. It can only help to do what we can to promote that perception.
