On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> >>or wathever. Killing AuthtType is good in that it propably lets you > >>combine different Accesses with Auth much cleaner. > >> > >>Dw > > > > Good point. After thinking about it, it seems that AuthType could be > > eliminated completely. The authentication type is already implied by Yea ho ! > > the use of the directives AuthBasicProvider, AuthDigestProvider or any > > other AuthXXXProvider that may come along in the future. Does anybody > > see a need to keep AuthType around at all under the new authentication > > architecture? > > I'm going a few rounds at the moment with a user that's confused between > ap_auth_type(r) and r->ap_auth_type, and why ap_auth_type(r) needs to be set Yep - this has taken me several years to understand myself :-) DW.
