-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 05:59:29PM -0800, Roy Fielding wrote: > >>What? No, sorry, -1. Your vote was on releasing 2.1.10. You should be >>releasing 2.1.10 to the public as GA. 2.2.0 is different -- it requires >>new documentation and a new tarball, and thus new votes. > > > But, um, we can't do that under our versioning rules. Only 2.2.x can be > called GA. > > (The docs in the 2.1.10 tarball should not need to be changed as it > already reports itself as 2.2 there.) > > My vote (and I believe the intent of the folks who voted for GA status) > was specifically for allowing this tarball to be called 2.2.0. -- justin
Hmm. That's what I thought I was voting on. And I certainly understood that Paul meant that too. - -- Rich Bowen [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDi7lsXP03+sx4yJMRAg4/AJ9xviNYdgLQEiTCOIi5kOPhv0LRHACgiYjk HhfyBklUpylwn8fI4WTJ6RU= =yi3N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
