Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
Ah... Sorry to jump the gun.On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 05:53:52AM -0600, Jess Holle wrote:I'm no commiter but must concur -- until the build runs cleanly on Windows 2.2.0 should not go out the door.Not everyone may like it, but Windows is a major Apache usage platform these days.mod_dbd isn't included in the win32 build environment yet, so it has no effect on a standard build. mod_dbd may or may not become available within the win32 build environment during the life of 2.2, but I don't think this should hold up GA. It's often the case that some modules or support utilities lag behind on win32. I'm anxious to start the move to 2.2 on various platforms (Windows, Solaris, and AIX). -- Jess Holle |
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Jess Holle
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Steffen
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Colm MacCarthaigh
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Joe Orton
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Jim Jagielski
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Jess Holle
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Jim Jagielski
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Olaf van der Spek
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Justin Erenkrantz