On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:56:56AM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > #2 would be in the release notes. > > > > I don't think anyone has said we wouldn't note it. > > That wasn't clear at the start of this thread. There was a tone > of "I don't care, that's no reason to stop the release" and > the impression that nothing would be done to address it.
Well, that's just silly. If you read my replies about this, in almost every one, I said something about including it in the release notes and moving on. I'm sure no one really meant that we wouldn't make some mention of it in the appropriate places given that we now know about it. -- justin
