Paul Querna wrote:
My intention is for this to be a wide open brainstorming thread.

I expect that we will be able to discuss several ideas in much more detail at the Hackathon next week, but I really want to get all ideas 'on the table'.

I have a few things I would like to see, but I am sure there are perhaps hundreds of other major features that other people want. It helps to know what everyone else is thinking about new features, rather than one person going off an doing it all by themselves. (not that I'll stop anyone from that either).

Here is my list:

* Async/Event MPM: Complete Async pipeline for static files. I believe we can seriously give every existing single-threaded-event-based server a run for their money on every existing benchmark. Toss in some dynamic content, and a hybrid Event/Worker has serious potential. Some of this work is ongoing in the async-read dev branch, but there is plenty more to do.

I've always wanted to (but not had free time) to write a SEDA-type mpm. the SEDA is slightly different to the async/event mpm in that a given hook/filter would process multiple events/requests at the same context switch. This is what the apr_queue stuff was initially designed for.

I'd also like to brainstorm a better solution to running Rails/Django applications inside of the httpd process than the SCGI/FastCGI solution which most people use.

Configuration .. make it configurable. by that I mean allowing people to use LDAP or a DB to hold the configuration files, and not a flat file. This is mainly intended for large server farms. Currently the main reason for logging onto a webserver is to change it's configuration (and bounce) .. if we could reduce that to just 'bounce' it might make life easier. (or some method where it checks configs every X minutes and autobounces..removing the need to log onto the machine at all ;-)

Configuration .. make it easier..I can't think of anything on how to do this off the top of my head, but it seems to be a common complaint.

Logging/debugging .. changing the log system to use something like Log4C for errors.. this way the module developer can easily turn on/off various information on a live system when he is having issues.



wish I could attend the ApacheCon.. if there was a ApacheCon OZ I'd be there ;-)

regards
Ian

Reply via email to