On 12/11/2005 01:51 AM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > On Dec 10, 2005, at 4:15 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Oy, crikey, I don't want that -- the proxy handler doesn't have the > information needed to complete the response. As I said before, the > right way to do it is to send the error downstream. There is no > need to leave the filter in an error state. > > As it turns out, we also have a request_rec->no_cache variable that > is supposed to be set in this case. I am curious whether the following > patch will work (after reverting r355823).
But with your approach you need to double the code in *each* scheme handler. r355823 tries to avoid this by doing it a little later in the proxy handler. I currently comment only on the position *where* you do it and not what. But of course in the proxy handler I do not have rv add hand any longer. The remaining part of the patch could be done also in the proxy handler with e->data set to an int that is non null. Ok. Other approach would be to put your code in a function of proxy_util.c where every scheme handler can call it. That sounds also like a good solution. Regards Rüdiger
