On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 09:37:25AM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: rpluem > Date: Sat Dec 17 01:37:22 2005 > New Revision: 357333 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357333&view=rev > Log: > * Add proposal for backport > > Modified: > httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS > > Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS?rev=357333&r1=357332&r2=357333&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.0.x/STATUS Sat Dec 17 01:37:22 2005 > @@ -321,6 +321,15 @@ > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16995 > +1: rpluem > > + *) Chunk filter: Fix ap_http_chunk_filter to create correct chunks in the > + case that a flush bucket is pre- and postfixed by data buckets in the > + brigade. > + Trunk version of patch: > + http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi?rev=357328&view=rev > + Backport version for 2.2.x of patch: > + http://people.apache.org/~rpluem/patches/chunk_2.0.x.diff > + +1: rpluem > +
FWIW, I believe Joe and I both explicitly said our votes count to merge back to 2.0 and 2.2 on-list. So, I'd go ahead and just merge back to both trees as well. (A +1 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] is equivalent to a vote in STATUS.) Thanks. -- justin
