On 1/8/06, Jim Jagielski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Author: rooneg > > Date: Sat Jan 7 13:37:40 2006 > > New Revision: 366926 > > > > Weird... Just yesterday I did the below, which allows us to > keep using FCGI headers where "natural" yet also resolves the > struct stuff.... I think the below is "simpler" since it > isolates things a bit.
One thing I prefer about the way I did it is that the code for taking a content length and splitting it up into the two bytes goes in a single place, rather showing up in a few different places. I'm also not sure I like the fcgi_array typedef. It would be one thing if it was able to ensure that the array passed around was 8 bytes long, but as it stands it just seems to hide the fact that it's an array of unsigned char's. -garrett
