Ian Holsman wrote:
5% is a pretty nice gain imho.
Unfortunately, it still lags behind our mod_cache equivalent by at least
20%. There is something fundamentally slow about mod_cache that I
cannot seem to put my finger on. Granted, ours is highly customized and
optimized, but I would expect stock mod_cache to within 10% of our
custom module. If I get time, I will try to massage our module into a
mod_cache provider. That would help me see if the bottleneck is in
mod_disk_cache or mod_cache - or it may prove nothing. I'm slammed this
week, however.
I have no intentions of my patches being accepted as is (as are??), I
just want to provoke some thought. I'm still working from this side to
allow us to release our code, but so far nothing :(
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
