* Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > I'm comfortable backporting all of the 2.0.x patches marked ACCEPTED > apart from the following two: > > *) mod_actions: Regression from 1.3: the file referred to must exist. > Solve this by introducing the "virtual" modifier to the Action > directive. PR 28553. > modules/mappers/mod_actions.c: r1.32, r1.34 > jerenkrantz: Icky side-effect of the *t == '0' check. > +1: nd, jerenkrantz, wrowe, jim > -0: by rbb (inconsistent to 1.3, discussion on dev@) > nd: I'm going to reverse the default > jerenkrantz, striker: I'm confused as to the status of this > backport. > > I have to agree with the last point. Is this accepted, or is it not, and > what are the subversion revision numbers? or where is a patch I can > apply?
as 2.2 is out yet and I didn't make it so far, I'd say, drop this one, because changing behaviour would now confuse people. nd -- Winnetous Erbe: <http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>
