> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Jim Jagielski > > Why the breaks? Certainly we still want to continue the > for loop even if we see a valid setting. For example, > to set a worker in DISABLED and STOPPED mode.
1. Currently there is no clear separation letter. 2. Setting status=disabled will result in "Unknow status parameter option" But maybe I just understand the syntax of status wrong and status should not be compiled of clear text words but rather of something cryptic like [eEdDsS\+-]+ where e,E is error d,D is disabled s,S is stopped But as it is not documented I don't know :-) Regards Rüdiger
