On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 05:52:50PM -0600, William Rowe wrote: > Ping jorton, > > you -0'ed the proposed patch below, with a suggested improvement. I have > not seen your comments yet on the adjustment to address your concern, which > I committed a week or two ago.
Yes, that's the change I meant. If you reference a patch I can apply without using vi I'll +1 it ;) > > What's your current vote? Opinions from anyone else? > > Bill > > >--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) > >+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Sat Feb 4 11:05:53 2006 > >@@ -150,11 +150,12 @@ > > > > * Fix mis-shifted 32 bit scope, masked to 64 bits as a method. > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=358040&view=rev > >- +1: wrowe, mturk > >+ +1: mturk > > -0: jorton: should use AP_METHOD_BIT > > wrowe asks; is this your desired patch? Please vote; > > - if (! (reqs[x].method_mask & (1 << m))) { > > + if (! (reqs[x].method_mask & (AP_METHOD_BIT << m))) { > >+ +1: wrowe (for flavor requested by jorton)
