* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-10 21:54:27]: > On 2/10/06, Maxime Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It works, in a very simple and common way, and changing the build > > system is not (yet) part of the showstoppers. Please keep in mind that > > I want this release to be some kind of out-of-SoC release, not a > > mod-mbox-has-become-the-killer-module one. > > To be clear, I've vetoed automake - no release can be done with an > outstanding veto on a commit. (If I knew how to kick out automake, I > would.)
Okkaay. Please read again my paragraph. Now please read the STATUS file. The current automake setup *works*, and migrating to the same build system than httpd is planned. If you don't want any mod_mbox release to go out until I find an fscking large piece of time to understand of to get rid of automake -aka in a very, very long time-, just say that, and I wont bother the list again. > > > And, then you can toss the ludicrous src/ directory too. All of the > > > dirs under src/ should be in the top level. > > > > The src/ directory is not ludicrous. It goes in the directory > > structure logic of splitting sources, includes and data. > > No. There should not be a src directory. Do you see one in httpd? I guess it's here a fight of tastes. Anyway, since it's my call against everybody else's, this will be done. > Data is also very ambiguous and gives no hint about what's actually in > that directory - docroot would probably be the best precendent httpd > has to offer. -- justin +1 here, this directory was named quickly at the begining of the summer and was never touched back. I'll change that. - Sam -- Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org) -- gone crazy, back soon. leave message.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
