On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:32:32AM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
>
> On 02/20/2006 11:50 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
>
> >>
> >>Maybe. Got another idea in the meantime. Maybe it is because we use the same
> >>socket to a backend, but we create a new conn_rec each time for this backend
> >>and thus try to reinit the existing ssl connection. Could you please give
> >>the
> >>following patch a try?
>
> Meanwhile I committed a better version of the patch as r379237.
> http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379237&view=rev
>
> If you have some cycles left could you please test? (I know that I should
> really
> get the test framework running on my box. First thing on my TODO list)
The regression test runs last night had between zero and three failures
in t/ssl/proxy.t in various builds (timing dependent, I guess); the
build which had three failures was:
t/ssl/proxy.................# Failed test 62 in t/ssl/proxy.t at line 112 fail
#2
# Failed test 92 in
/tmp/regressm31826/pf-trunk-prefork/Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestCommonPost.pm at
line 131 fail #81
# Failed test 109 in
/tmp/regressm31826/pf-trunk-prefork/Apache-Test/lib/Apache/TestCommonPost.pm at
line 131 fail #98
FAILED tests 62, 92, 109
Failed 3/172 tests, 98.26% okay
joe
