On 3/16/06, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 03/16/2006 03:49 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On 3/15/06, Brad Nicholes wrote: > > > > > That is really one pool globally but there is a mutex per server_rec. > > So a thread handling a request for one vhost grabs the mutex and uses > > the pool but that doesn't protect from a thread handling a request for > > a different vhost which grabs a different mutex supposedly protecting > > the same pool. > > Would it help to create sub-pools per server_rec from the config pool?
That sounds like a definite improvement, but I'm eager for LDAP gurus to explain how pool growth is mitigated in the current design (assuming thread safety) before jumping to a conclusion.
