Ruediger Pluem wrote: > > Argh. It seems that http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379237&view=rev has not > been > backported. My fault not taking more care of this :-(. > So I am now -1. > Should I propose r379237 for backport?
++1 ! :) -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
