So does that mean if one grabs the 2.2.1 tar ball one will not be able
to build on Windows?
If so, that's not a very compelling tarball for those needing to support
Windows.
If 2.2.1 is being labeled as non-GA already then that's quite
appropriate, move on to 2.2.2 as soon as possible. 2.2.1 shouldn't be
labeled as GA if it does not build on Windows "as is", though.
--
Jess Holle
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
On 4/1/06, Steffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No go on win32:
unresolved external symbol [EMAIL PROTECTED] referenced in
function _show_compile_settings
.\Release/httpd.exe : fatal error LNK1120
This is fixed on APR 0.9 / 1.2 branches and 1.3 trunk.
Brad's fixed this on 1.2 branch and 1.3 trunk - and I have a pending
request to him to ensure it's fixed on 0.9 branch as well.
My thought is reroll aprutil, which i'll do tonight. The problem isn't
with httpd; the problem's with the maintenance on two platforms, and
that's
what the release notes/CHANGES will say.
Bill
