On 4/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jorge Schrauwen wrote:
> Interesting, i'll give it another shot later today, 2.2.0 was comply
> totaled if trying as Win64.
Yup, mostly hopeless back then.
> Making 2.0 Win64 compatible is to mutch work IMHO.
> Focusing on 2.2 is a great idea...
Couple observations; pcre is quite LP64 dirty; this is observed under
darwin x686 and win64. so don't necessarily expect 2.2.1 to build win64
clean yet out of the zip, and it may be a few more cycles before every
issuees is resolved.
It brings up a good question, which contributors are monitoring our
flavor of pcre for updates from the pcre community, and liasoning back
our changes to pcre to it's project?
Acutally it builds just fine without mod_ssl and mod_deflate...
Ok lots of warnings... so thats not so good but it seems fine.
stock config works fine,
Dav seems to work aswel
no go for 3rd party mods as was to be expected
--
~Jorge
