Hmm, I'm getting pointed at a thread titled "any undocumented showstoppers for 2.0.56", but it's not in my mailbox yet.
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 06:48:25PM +0100, Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: > As the last blocker to a 2.0.x release has now cleared, I'm going to > make good on my offer and finally roll a candidate. Apart from the > licensing blocker, 2.0.x has been in good shape for about 3 months now, > and even tests clean. > > I'm not sure if I'm stepping on anyone's toes here, if I am, I don't > mean to be, I can remember a few different abandonded potential releases > at this point, I just wanna get the basic fixes out there. > > The original plan, from some months ago, is that we would release the > next 2.0.x and 2.2.x releases in close proximity, to try and avoid 2.2 > users downgrading without knowing any better. 2.2 looks in a releaseable > state, but I havn't been tracking it as closely, but might that still be > a possibility? > > Though I am mindful that the last time we got to this stage, an annoying > showstopper came along, so who knows ;) > > -- > Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
