On 4/19/06, Nick Kew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wednesday 19 April 2006 16:06, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > > +1 on merging to trunk, +0 on 2.2.x. I'd love to see someone actually > > > using it for something real before it goes into any release, and at > > > this point I'm not sure it has... > > > > Hence my desire to get it into a branch that people are actively > > playing with :) > > So release it as a standalone module for 2.2 that builds cleanly - > like for example mod_mbox? > > That way people get to use it before it goes into the main product. > And they will, 'cos fastcgi is popular:-) Once the FAQs that generates > are dealt with is the time to contemplate backporting to 2.2 itself.
For the current mod_proxy_fcgi that's probably possible, but the next round of changes will likely require modification to mod_proxy itself, which throws that idea out the window. -garrett
