On 4/19/06, Colm MacCarthaigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Eek, This has already been done, for trunk and for the 3 branches.
Ugh. Then, we should just update to Jackrabbit's license clause if we're going to have churn in that area. But, if we're going to touch it, then we should change it to the 'right' thing instead of continuing down the wrong path. > That won't have changed, so I don't think the update will have caused > any harm. We want to minimize the number of diffs in a release. That's why we generally have not done this on release branches. > Out of curiousity, have you got a pointer to what jackrabbit use? http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/trunk/jackrabbit/src/main/java/org/apache/jackrabbit/JcrConstants.java If we're dead set on doing anything, I would suggest that we just go change everything to match Jackrabbit. Obviously, Roy approved of that wording; so we know he likes it. ;-) -- justin
