On Wednesday 19 April 2006 21:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >=== --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS (original) > +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS Wed Apr 19 13:26:09 2006 > @@ -114,6 +114,11 @@ > comment misled my review! Fix the comment and you have my +1 > for the fix. > jim: agrees with niq. > + rpluem: Does http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=395381&view=rev > address + the concerns (BTW: Same text as colm used in the > backport to 2.0.x + (r395197))?
Looks fine to me. The problem with the previous text is that it had me looking for the wrong logic in the code, and spending some time figuring out it wasn't a bug. -- Nick Kew
