Davi Arnaut wrote:
This way it would be possible for one cache to act as a cache of another cache provider, mod_mem_cache would work as a small/fast MRU cache for mod_disk_cache.
Slightly off subject, but in my testing, mod_disk_cache is much faster than mod_mem_cache. Thanks to sendifle!
I was thinking about scenarios were each cache had there local cache (disk, mem, whatever) with memcache behind it. That way each "object" only has to be generated once for the entire "farm." This would be an easy way to have a distributed cache.
Also, the squid type htcp (or icp) could be a failback for the local cache as well without mucking up all the proxy and cache code.
-- Brian Akins Lead Systems Engineer CNN Internet Technologies
