On Mon, May 08, 2006 at 10:12:58AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > On May 8, 2006, at 7:36 AM, Nick Kew wrote: > > >OK, we all know we get some embarrassing regressions in our new > >releases. PR#39490 in 1.3.35. > > That is an unexpected and unwelcome regression. If I had > known about it I would have vetoed the patch. I'd be willing > to actually release a 1.3.36 simply to address that.
I don't think any of this should be unexpected. All of the recent 1.3.x/2.0.x regressions I can think of have been caused by adding new features. New features come at an increased risk of regressions - live with it, or stop doing it! :) joe
