On 5/27/06, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 05/27/2006 03:58 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > Are there still fundamental pieces missing from mod_proxy_ajp + > mod_proxy_balancer which have to be resolved before mod_proxy_ajp is > the natural solution for anybody on Apache >= 2.2? Currently mod_proxy_balancer lacks the domain feature of mod_jk, but I do not know if this is regarded as fundamental piece.
shrug
> Isn't pass-through of client SSL connection information another > problem with mod_proxy? (servlets can't access cipher or client > certificate) AFAIK not with mod_proxy_ajp. It seems to pass all these information to Tomcat.
oops, I meant "... problem with using generic HTTP support with mod_proxy -- mod_proxy_http"; I agree, the functional problem doesn't apply to mod_proxy_ajp
