On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:01:12AM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 02:03:33PM -0700, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > Okay, let me put it in a different way. The alternatives are > > > > 1) retain the status quo, forbid distributing ssl binaries, and > > include in our documentation that people in banned countries are not > > allowed to download httpd 2.x. > > This gets my vote. I don't see why it's necessary for the ASF to be in > the business of distributing binaries; letting other people assume the > technical and legal responsibilites for doing that seems reasonable. > +1. I'd really like to see the current source stay as it is with mod_ssl included. If anything, it shouldn't be too hard to produce a patch that strips out mod_ssl at release time if we want to roll an extra non crypto version for that handfull of countries.
vh Mads Toftum -- `Darn it, who spiked my coffee with water?!' - lwall
