On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 13:54 -0400, Brian Akins wrote: > Guy Hulbert wrote: > > That's the ultimate case, after all :-) > > Not necessarily. Google's answer is to throw tons of hardware at > stuff.
The point of contention was scalability ... from a human point of view it is really annoying to have to solve a problem twice but from the business pov, outgrowing your load balancer might only be a good thing. -- --gh
