On 08/01/2006 01:48 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > =?iso-8859-1?Q?Pl=FCm=2C_R=FCdiger=2C_VF_EITO?= wrote: > >> >> >>>-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- >>>Von: Ruediger Pluem=20 >>>=20 >>>BTW: Don't we need to reset checked_standby and=20 >>>checking_standby to zero in >>> the outer while loop? >> >>What about this? I guess we don't enter the inner while loop a second = >>time >>because checked_standby > 0 once we have checked for the standby workers >>during the first time. >> > > > That's right. We are guaranteed to go through the full list as least > once, and it's during that time that we determine what the > max lbset was/is.
Thats correct, but we start the second iteration of the while loop with checked_standby and checking_standby set to the values of the first iteration. This seems wrong to me. I think they both should be zero before *each* start of the inner while loop. If checked_standby is not zero we do not even enter the inner while loop. Regards Rüdiger
