William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Colm MacCarthaigh wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 10, 2006 at 12:26:23PM -0700, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: >>> Pretty darned quiet - either "it's summer" or nobody feels like >>> joining the fray when Roy and Will go at it? >> Well, Paul's talk in San Diego got me thinking. We're not really "just" >> about HTTP any more, it's a misnomer. We're about delivering information >> using many different protocols accross the internet. I don't know, >> something like Internet Information Server just seems more appropriate >> somehow. > > LOL :) Well as I said; focus is on the name of what's /repos/asf/httpd/httpd > today. Granted, "d" might be a bit too general, but I agree with everyone > who's said that the 'next release' aught to get a broader name than just > plain old Apache HTTP Server. Apache ++HTTP Server? Apache Scheme[] Server? > Some wordplay with MPM (since that's by far the distinguishing characteristic > of today's httpd over all previous ones, and colors the implementation of any > protocol that's compiled into the server.) > > Apache Empeem Server?
Man, naming incubator projects is hell enough, why bring that kind of wasted time to [EMAIL PROTECTED] On a serious note, For all future 1.3.x and 2.x releases, 'Apache HTTP Server' or whatever the consensus turns out to be is fine by me. I still stand by "Apache Server Framework" as the best choice. The ASF'S ASF is the ultimate way to deliver data from a server :) Anyways, I honestly don't care about this in any real manner until we are much closer to a 3.0 stage. -Paul
