On Mon, 2006-09-10 at 09:24 +0100, Nick Kew wrote: > On Monday 09 October 2006 07:53, Boyle Owen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Speaking as an apache user (not developer) who merely lurks on this > > list, is it appropriate for me to question the formatting (and hence > > usefulness) of this periodic report? <snip> > Thanks for opening the debate! <snip> > > from a DB query, it might be as simple as replacing DESC with ASC..) > > IMHO that's supremely unimportant. I just delete these messages
Hmmm ... me too. <snip> > It's just a database result. Bear in mind that some old bugs really *should* > be fixed (e.g. bug 17629). But many others are left open for altogether > different reasons: <snip> > > | Total 739 bugs > > That's the bottom line of what makes a flat list like this useless, IMO. It seems that what would be useful is a summary of counts by type and a list of those bugs whose status has changed ? -- --gh
