Jeff Trawick wrote: > > On 10/12/06, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > On 10/11/2006 11:09 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > > On 10/11/06, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > >> 2. Although GET is mentioned to be idempotent in RFC 2616 (9.1.2) > > >> along with some other methods > > >> it is not a good idea to regard a GET / HEAD with query parameters > > >> to be idempotent. > > > > > > > > > <Location /proxy/all_gets_are_idempotent> > > > SetEnv foomatic=1 > > > </Location> > > > > Sorry I don't get the point here. Could you please explain? > > Allow the administrator to declare that GETs/HEADs are idempotent even > if they have query args, with a few lines of code to check some > envvar. >
If actually needed ( :) ) +1 on concept -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
