On Fri, October 27, 2006 6:36 pm, Paul Querna wrote: > I think we have had enough -1s passed over the last couple days related > to mod_cache, that it indicates there is not a consensus on what should > be done, nor on how it should be done. > > I think we need to stop committing code for a couple days, and try to > make a rudimentary plan for the intended changes to mod_cache, and try > to gather some kind of consensus on them, rather than continuing down > the path of -1s and long ass mailing list threads. > > Thoughts?
An option raised earlier in these threads was to use the cache framework that we have, and simply define another cache type, say "mod_large_disk_cache". The issues related to the experiences of Brian and Niklas show that maybe one size doesn't fit all. It will also make a base for effective comparison between caching strategies. Regards, Graham --
