On Tue, October 31, 2006 3:29 pm, Plüm, Rüdiger, VF EITO wrote: >> I meant to also mention (sorry for all the mail): it prevents >> mod_mem_cache's fd caching trick too, which relies on being >> passed FILE >> buckets. > > That seems to be an important point to me. Although I never used > the fd caching of mod_mem_cache this would mean we actually would > have to dump this feature. This looks bad to me. Isn't this a showstopper > for implementing #3 as new interface?
I believe that it is. Regards, Graham --
