On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 12:27:31PM -0500, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Mladen Turk wrote: > > > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Looking over CHANGES and STATUS, I think we should > > > start thinking about a 2.2.4 release. Comments? > > > > I would like to propose the backport of proxy alternate > > is_socket_connected. This is IMHO very crucial > > for AJP to work. Without that the loadbalancer is > > unusable for most platforms. > > > > I know that Bill is looking at a release of APR and > that alternate method would, I think, be better > implemented in APR than directly in httpd...
Eww, no thanks. AFAIK the same results can be achieved using existing APR interfaces: a non-blocking apr_socket_recv() passing the MSG_PEEK flag, as I mentioned this on [EMAIL PROTECTED] already. joe
